lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YyhR9OGjWVwm31Rp@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:26:44 +0300
From:   Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Christian König 
        <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
Cc:     Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        "Yadav, Arvind" <arvyadav@....com>,
        Arvind Yadav <Arvind.Yadav@....com>, andrey.grodzovsky@....com,
        shashank.sharma@....com, amaranath.somalapuram@....com,
        Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@....com, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
        gustavo@...ovan.org, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] dma-buf: Check status of
 enable-signaling bit on debug

On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 05:18:40PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 17.09.22 um 08:17 schrieb Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 06:05:30PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> >> Am 15.09.22 um 15:02 schrieb Yadav, Arvind:
> >>> On 9/15/2022 5:37 PM, Christian König wrote:
> >>>> Is that sufficient to allow running a desktop on amdgpu with the
> >>>> extra check enabled? If yes that would be quite a milestone.
> >>>>
> >>> Yes, It is running on amdgpu with extra config enabled.
> >> In this case I will start pushing the patches to drm-misc-next. I'm just
> >> going to leave out the last one until the IGT tests are working as well.
> > ffs Christian. intel CI blew up yet again:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12146/shard-glk7/igt@kms_plane_lowres@tiling-y@pipe-c-hdmi-a-2.html
> >
> > The last time (some ttm thing) was just a week or two ago,
> > so it's really getting tiresome watching you push entirely
> > untested stuff all the time. Would be really helpful if you
> > finally started to do/require premerge testing.
> 
> Well first of all sorry for causing trouble, but as I wrote above I 
> intentionally left out the last one to *not* break the IGT tests.
> 
> The patches pushed so far where just updating a bunch of corner cases 
> and fixing the selftests.
> 
> Do you have any more insight why that should affect the IGT tests?

I have no idea. You have the oopses from pstore right there.
Did you even look at them?

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ