[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7507d61-9d16-c2d3-2066-5e2f9afd6eb9@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 09:49:12 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, bhupesh.linux@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vkoul@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: dma: Make minor fixes to qcom,bam-dma
binding doc
On 18/09/2022 09:11, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> As a user recently noted, the qcom,bam-dma binding document
> describes the BAM DMA node incorrectly.
It's a bit confusing - what is exactly incorrectly described by binding?
You did not make any changes to the binding itself...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists