linux-kernel - Re: Linux 6.0-rc6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:28:18 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Csókás Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.0-rc6

On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:06:53 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 01:56:17PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So this is an artificially small -rc release, because this past week
> > we had the Maintainers' Summit in Dublin (along with OSS EU and LPC
> > 2022), so we've had a lot of maintainers traveling.
> > 
> > Or - putting my ridiculously optimistic hat on - maybe things are just
> > so nice and stable that there just weren't all that many fixes?
> > 
> > Yeah, I know which scenario I'm betting on, but hope springs eternal.
> > 
> > Regardless, things look fine. I am expecting rc7 to be larger than
> > usual due to pull requests having shifted one week later, and in the
> > worst case that might mean that I might feel like we need an extra
> > rc8, but for now I'm going to assume it's not going to be _that_
> > noticeable and hope we'll just keep to the regular schedule.
> > 
> > But it would be lovely if everybody gave this some extra tender loving
> > care in the form of extra testing...
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 149 pass: 149 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 490 pass: 489 fail: 1
> Failed tests:
> 	mcf5208evb:m5208:m5208evb_defconfig:initrd

Is this also us? I can't find the report.

> TL;DR: Patches / reverts needed to fix known regressions
> 
> Revert "net: fec: Use a spinlock to guard `fep->ptp_clk_on`"
> Revert "fec: Restart PPS after link state change"

Will be fixed by Thu.