linux-kernel - Re: Linux 6.0-rc6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b5d1beef-a0e8-a061-eccf-cc0e56c23fd4@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2022 08:02:41 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Csókás Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.0-rc6

On 9/19/22 07:28, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 21:06:53 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 01:56:17PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> So this is an artificially small -rc release, because this past week
>>> we had the Maintainers' Summit in Dublin (along with OSS EU and LPC
>>> 2022), so we've had a lot of maintainers traveling.
>>>
>>> Or - putting my ridiculously optimistic hat on - maybe things are just
>>> so nice and stable that there just weren't all that many fixes?
>>>
>>> Yeah, I know which scenario I'm betting on, but hope springs eternal.
>>>
>>> Regardless, things look fine. I am expecting rc7 to be larger than
>>> usual due to pull requests having shifted one week later, and in the
>>> worst case that might mean that I might feel like we need an extra
>>> rc8, but for now I'm going to assume it's not going to be _that_
>>> noticeable and hope we'll just keep to the regular schedule.
>>>
>>> But it would be lovely if everybody gave this some extra tender loving
>>> care in the form of extra testing...
>>
>> Build results:
>> 	total: 149 pass: 149 fail: 0
>> Qemu test results:
>> 	total: 490 pass: 489 fail: 1
>> Failed tests:
>> 	mcf5208evb:m5208:m5208evb_defconfig:initrd
> 
> Is this also us? I can't find the report.
> 

It is caused by "fec: Restart PPS after link state change",
and reverting that patch fixes the problem.

Guenter