lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220920072454.4cf91f24@maurocar-mobl2>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2022 07:24:54 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mauro.chehab@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...el.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Let userspace know when snd-hda-intel needs i915

Hi Luis,

On Mon, 9 May 2022 13:38:28 -0700
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 06:23:35PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Currently, kernel/module annotates module dependencies when
> > request_symbol is used, but it doesn't cover more complex inter-driver
> > dependencies that are subsystem and/or driver-specific.
> >   
> 
> At this pount v5.18-rc7 is out and so it is too late to soak this
> in for the proper level of testing I'd like to see for modules-next.
> So I can review this after the next merge window. I'd want to beat
> the hell out of this and if possible I'd like to see if we can have
> some test coverage for the intended goal and how to break it.

Any news with regards to this patch series?

Regards,
Mauro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ