[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3196b824-bcee-0c44-bfd3-f6cd8a1e6719@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:10:35 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/secretmem: remove reduntant return value
On 20.09.22 03:22, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
> The return value @ret is always 0, so remove it and return 0 directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
> ---
> mm/secretmem.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/secretmem.c b/mm/secretmem.c
> index 6a44efb673b2..04c3ac9448a1 100644
> --- a/mm/secretmem.c
> +++ b/mm/secretmem.c
> @@ -278,10 +278,8 @@ static struct file_system_type secretmem_fs = {
>
> static int __init secretmem_init(void)
> {
> - int ret = 0;
> -
> if (!secretmem_enable)
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
>
> secretmem_mnt = kern_mount(&secretmem_fs);
> if (IS_ERR(secretmem_mnt))
On top of which tree is that?
6.0-rc6 has here:
if (IS_ERR(secretmem_mnt))
ret = PTR_ERR(secretmem_mnt);
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists