[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220921153646.852112067@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:46:02 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Roesch <shr@...com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 18/38] block: blk_queue_enter() / __bio_queue_enter() must return -EAGAIN for nowait
From: Stefan Roesch <shr@...com>
[ Upstream commit 56f99b8d06ef1ed1c9730948f9f05ac2b930a20b ]
Today blk_queue_enter() and __bio_queue_enter() return -EBUSY for the
nowait code path. This is not correct: they should return -EAGAIN
instead.
This problem was detected by fio. The following command exposed the
above problem:
t/io_uring -p0 -d128 -b4096 -s32 -c32 -F1 -B0 -R0 -X1 -n24 -P1 -u1 -O0 /dev/ng0n1
By applying the patch, the retry case is handled correctly in the slow
path.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@...com>
Fixes: bfd343aa1718 ("blk-mq: don't wait in blk_mq_queue_enter() if __GFP_WAIT isn't set")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
block/blk-core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 27fb1357ad4b..cc6fbcb6d252 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ int blk_queue_enter(struct request_queue *q, blk_mq_req_flags_t flags)
while (!blk_try_enter_queue(q, pm)) {
if (flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT)
- return -EBUSY;
+ return -EAGAIN;
/*
* read pair of barrier in blk_freeze_queue_start(), we need to
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ int __bio_queue_enter(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
if (test_bit(GD_DEAD, &disk->state))
goto dead;
bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
- return -EBUSY;
+ return -EAGAIN;
}
/*
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists