linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 15/19] dt-bindings: memory: snps: Use more descriptive device name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Sep 2022 20:32:37 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     mchehab@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, michal.simek@...inx.com,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru, manish.narani@...inx.com,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, bp@...en8.de
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        punnaiah.choudary.kalluri@...inx.com, krzk@...nel.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rric@...nel.org, james.morse@....com,
        Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru, dinguyen@...nel.org,
        robh@...nel.org, Michail.Ivanov@...kalelectronics.ru,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru,
        fancer.lancer@...il.com
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 15/19] dt-bindings: memory: snps: Use more descriptive device name

On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 22:42:33 +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> The DT-schema name and the corresponding generic compatible string look
> inappropriate in the current DW uMCTL2 DDRC DT-bindings:
> 1. DT-schema name contains undefined vendor-prefix. It's supposed to be
> "snps", not "synopsys".
> 2. DT-schema name has "ecc" suffix. That is a device property, and has
> nothing to do with the controller actual name.
> 3. The controller name is different. It's DW uMCTL2 DDRC. Just DDRC
> doesn't identify the IP-core in subject.
> 4. There is no much point in using the IP-core version in the device name
> since it can be retrieved from the corresponding device CSR. Moreover the
> DW uMCTL2 DDRC driver doesn't differentiate the IP-core version at the
> current state.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[15/19] dt-bindings: memory: snps: Use more descriptive device name
        https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux-mem-ctrl/c/9f60675a0f2e72f7967cc534f1c97f6da3b47392

Best regards,
-- 
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>