[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de576d19-4132-c039-f543-8800024f87a7@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 11:49:33 +0000
From: <Sergiu.Moga@...rochip.com>
To: <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>, <lee@...nel.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro>, <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
<Kavyasree.Kotagiri@...rochip.com>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] tty: serial: atmel: Make the driver aware of the
existence of GCLK
On 21.09.2022 09:27, Claudiu Beznea - M18063 wrote:
> On 21.09.2022 08:51, Claudiu Beznea - M18063 wrote:
>> On 19.09.2022 18:08, Sergiu Moga wrote:
>>> Previously, the atmel serial driver did not take into account the
>>> possibility of using the more customizable generic clock as its
>>> baudrate generator. Unless there is a Fractional Part available to
>>> increase accuracy, there is a high chance that we may be able to
>>> generate a baudrate closer to the desired one by using the GCLK as the
>>> clock source. Now, depending on the error rate between
>>> the desired baudrate and the actual baudrate, the serial driver will
>>> fallback on the generic clock. The generic clock must be provided
>>> in the DT node of the serial that may need a more flexible clock source.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
>
> Actually, I'm taking this back at the moment.
>
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>> - take into account the different placement of the baudrate clock source
>>> into the IP's Mode Register (USART vs UART)
>>> - don't check for atmel_port->gclk != NULL
>>> - use clk_round_rate instead of clk_set_rate + clk_get_rate
>>> - remove clk_disable_unprepare from the end of the probe method
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> v2 -> v3:
>>> - add the error rate calculation function as an inline function instead of
>>> a macro definition
>>> - add `gclk_fail` goto
>>> - replace `goto err` with `goto err_clk_disable_unprepare;`
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> v3 -> v4:
>>> - Nothing, this was previously [PATCH 14]
>>>
>>>
>>> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>>> index c983798a4ab2..426f9d4f9a5a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/init.h>
>>> #include <linux/serial.h>
>>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>> #include <linux/console.h>
>>> #include <linux/sysrq.h>
>>> #include <linux/tty_flip.h>
>>> @@ -110,6 +111,7 @@ struct atmel_uart_char {
>>> struct atmel_uart_port {
>>> struct uart_port uart; /* uart */
>>> struct clk *clk; /* uart clock */
>>> + struct clk *gclk; /* uart generic clock */
>>> int may_wakeup; /* cached value of device_may_wakeup for times we need to disable it */
>>> u32 backup_imr; /* IMR saved during suspend */
>>> int break_active; /* break being received */
>>> @@ -229,6 +231,11 @@ static inline int atmel_uart_is_half_duplex(struct uart_port *port)
>>> (port->iso7816.flags & SER_ISO7816_ENABLED);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static inline int atmel_error_rate(int desired_value, int actual_value)
>>> +{
>>> + return 100 - (desired_value * 100) / actual_value;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_ATMEL_PDC
>>> static bool atmel_use_pdc_rx(struct uart_port *port)
>>> {
>>> @@ -2117,6 +2124,8 @@ static void atmel_serial_pm(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int state,
>>> * This is called on uart_close() or a suspend event.
>>> */
>>> clk_disable_unprepare(atmel_port->clk);
>>> + if (__clk_is_enabled(atmel_port->gclk))
>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(atmel_port->gclk);
>>> break;
>>> default:
>>> dev_err(port->dev, "atmel_serial: unknown pm %d\n", state);
>>> @@ -2132,7 +2141,9 @@ static void atmel_set_termios(struct uart_port *port,
>>> {
>>> struct atmel_uart_port *atmel_port = to_atmel_uart_port(port);
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>> - unsigned int old_mode, mode, imr, quot, baud, div, cd, fp = 0;
>>> + unsigned int old_mode, mode, imr, quot, div, cd, fp = 0;
>>> + unsigned int baud, actual_baud, gclk_rate;
>>> + int ret;
>>>
>>> /* save the current mode register */
>>> mode = old_mode = atmel_uart_readl(port, ATMEL_US_MR);
>>> @@ -2302,6 +2313,46 @@ static void atmel_set_termios(struct uart_port *port,
>>> cd = min_t(unsigned int, cd, ATMEL_US_CD);
>>> }
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * If there is no Fractional Part, there is a high chance that
>>> + * we may be able to generate a baudrate closer to the desired one
>>> + * if we use the GCLK as the clock source driving the baudrate
>>> + * generator.
>>> + */
>>> + if (!atmel_port->has_frac_baudrate) {
>>> + if (__clk_is_enabled(atmel_port->gclk))
>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(atmel_port->gclk);
>>> + gclk_rate = clk_round_rate(atmel_port->gclk, 16 * baud);
>>> + actual_baud = clk_get_rate(atmel_port->clk) / (16 * cd);
>>> + if (gclk_rate && abs(atmel_error_rate(baud, actual_baud)) >
>>> + abs(atmel_error_rate(baud, gclk_rate / 16))) {
>
> If this condition fails and you previously used GCLK for clock generation
> you should remove bits ATMEL_US_USCLKS or ATMEL_UA_BRSRCCK from mode
> variable, to avoid configuring MR with GCLK support and clock not being
> properly setup.
>
This will not happen, since the code block placed at the very start of
atmel_set_termios()
/* reset the mode, clock divisor, parity, stop bits and data size */
mode &= ~(ATMEL_US_USCLKS | ATMEL_US_CHRL | ATMEL_US_NBSTOP |
ATMEL_US_PAR | ATMEL_US_USMODE);
will still clear the ATMEL_UA_BRSRCCK bitfield since it is the same as
the ATMEL_US_NBSTOP bitfield.
It is ugly and it has been working so far just through the coincidence
of the bitfields placement.
I did not want to change those lines as I did not really think of them
as worth being part of this patch series (PATCH 8 of this series is an
exception as it does introduce the needed is_usart boolean).
I will send a patch regarding this, but separately since it is more like
a pure cleanup related PATCH, in my opinion.
>>> + clk_set_rate(atmel_port->gclk, 16 * baud);
>>> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(atmel_port->gclk);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto gclk_fail;
>>> +
>>> + if (atmel_port->is_usart) {
>>> + mode &= ~ATMEL_US_USCLKS;
>>> + mode |= ATMEL_US_USCLKS_GCLK;
>>> + } else {
>>> + mode &= ~ATMEL_UA_BRSRCCK;
>>> + mode |= ATMEL_UA_BRSRCCK_GCLK;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Set the Clock Divisor for GCLK to 1.
>>> + * Since we were able to generate the smallest
>>> + * multiple of the desired baudrate times 16,
>>> + * then we surely can generate a bigger multiple
>>> + * with the exact error rate for an equally increased
>>> + * CD. Thus no need to take into account
>>> + * a higher value for CD.
>>> + */
>>> + cd = 1;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +gclk_fail:
>>> quot = cd | fp << ATMEL_US_FP_OFFSET;
>>>
>>> if (!(port->iso7816.flags & SER_ISO7816_ENABLED))
>>> @@ -2897,6 +2948,12 @@ static int atmel_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto err;
>>>
>>> + atmel_port->gclk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "gclk");
>>> + if (IS_ERR(atmel_port->gclk)) {
>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(atmel_port->gclk);
>>> + goto err_clk_disable_unprepare;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> ret = atmel_init_port(atmel_port, pdev);
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto err_clk_disable_unprepare;
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists