linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 01/17] dt-bindings: clk: mediatek: Add MT8195 DPI clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220922193104.4qminv6adrajkhw2@meerkat.local>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:31:04 -0400
From:   Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
        CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Jitao shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>,
        Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Pablo Sun <pablo.sun@...iatek.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@...libre.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/17] dt-bindings: clk: mediatek: Add MT8195 DPI
 clocks

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 02:51:00PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Thanks for explanation! Probably your patches are perfectly fine and
> should apply, although I must admit diffstat is often useful.

Krzysztof:

The patches should indeed apply without problems and there's a fix for the
missing diffstat already in place.

Best regards,
Konstantin