[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1dca4a7f-f4d7-9fd7-69f0-5b0aec51bdef@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 22:22:17 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] nvmem: core: introduce NVMEM layouts
On 21/09/2022 10:58, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>
> Srinivas, can you give us an update on what you think about this
> series (not a commitment, just how you feel it overall)?
>
Overall this is going in right direction, there are few bindings related
comments once those are sorted out it should be good to go.
From NVMEM side am happy with this feature, which has been a long
pending one.
We have few discussions on ONIE standard before, layouts would fit in
nicely.
--srini
> Michael, is there a v3 in preparation? I'll try to write something on
> top of your v2 otherwise.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists