[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220923103105.0894845c@xps-13>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:31:05 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] nvmem: core: introduce NVMEM layouts
Hi Srinivas,
Thanks for the quick feedback.
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org wrote on Thu, 22 Sep 2022 22:22:17 +0100:
> On 21/09/2022 10:58, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >
> > Srinivas, can you give us an update on what you think about this
> > series (not a commitment, just how you feel it overall)?
> >
> Overall this is going in right direction, there are few bindings related comments once those are sorted out it should be good to go.
Ok, let's tackle those.
> From NVMEM side am happy with this feature, which has been a long pending one.
>
> We have few discussions on ONIE standard before, layouts would fit in nicely.
I agree they would.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists