[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c21b9c95-ae35-fd7e-9e8e-6926703725b4@foss.st.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:29:45 +0200
From: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...s.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: stm32: add missing entries for gpio
subnodes
Hi Krzysztof
On 9/19/22 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/09/2022 09:46, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>> Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to
>> fix dtb validation.
>
> Rebase your patch on recent Linux kernel and use get_maintainers.pl.
I did it on 6.0-rc5 but yes I used your kernel.org address instead of
linaro ones. Sorry.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>> index d35dcc4f0242..92582cccbb1b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ patternProperties:
>> '#gpio-cells':
>> const: 2
>>
>> + interrupt-controller: true
>> + '#interrupt-cells':
>> + const: 2
>> +
>> reg:
>> maxItems: 1
>> clocks:
>> @@ -80,6 +84,8 @@ patternProperties:
>> minimum: 1
>> maximum: 16
>>
>> + gpio-line-names: true
>
> maxItems?
Generic question, Is it mandatory to add maxItems information for all
entries ?
For sure I'll send a v2 with it.
Alex
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists