linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Get rid of devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:48:26 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Get rid of
 devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child()

Hi Pavel, Marek,

On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 05:55:24PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> This drops the last uses of devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child()
> from the tree and drops the stubs implementing this API on top of
> devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index().
> 
> Note that the bulk of users were converted in 2019, the couple of LED
> drivers are all that have remained.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> 
> ---
> Dmitry Torokhov (3):
>       leds: gpio: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()
>       leds: lgm-sso: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()
>       gpiolib: remove devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child()
> 
>  drivers/leds/blink/leds-lgm-sso.c |  5 ++---
>  drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c          |  5 ++---
>  include/linux/gpio/consumer.h     | 21 ---------------------
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 7fd22855300e693668c3397771b3a2b3948f827a
> change-id: 20220902-get_gpiod_from_child-remove-a62638849e91
> 

Could you please consider picking this up for 6.1? Or would you be OK
with this going through other tree (GPIO maybe)?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry