[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1aCgJihNIqExUR2@google.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 05:18:08 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Get rid of
devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child()
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 02:48:26PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Pavel, Marek,
>
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 05:55:24PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > This drops the last uses of devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child()
> > from the tree and drops the stubs implementing this API on top of
> > devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index().
> >
> > Note that the bulk of users were converted in 2019, the couple of LED
> > drivers are all that have remained.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> >
> > ---
> > Dmitry Torokhov (3):
> > leds: gpio: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()
> > leds: lgm-sso: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()
> > gpiolib: remove devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child()
> >
> > drivers/leds/blink/leds-lgm-sso.c | 5 ++---
> > drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c | 5 ++---
> > include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 21 ---------------------
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> > ---
> > base-commit: 7fd22855300e693668c3397771b3a2b3948f827a
> > change-id: 20220902-get_gpiod_from_child-remove-a62638849e91
> >
>
> Could you please consider picking this up for 6.1? Or would you be OK
> with this going through other tree (GPIO maybe)?
*ping* Could this go through GPIO tree? Dropping this API helps with
some outstanding work that I have...
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists