linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 12/14] dt-bindings: net: dsa: ocelot: add ocelot-ext documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 20:31:22 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 12/14] dt-bindings: net: dsa: ocelot: add
 ocelot-ext documentation

On 23/09/2022 20:18, Colin Foster wrote:
>> "Currently supported" by hardware or by some specific, chosen
>> implementation? If the latter, drop it. If the former, maybe this should
>> be constrained in allOf:if:then.
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Currently supported by the software. This patch set explicitly adds
> support for the four internal ports. There'll be another patch set right
> around the corner that'll add QSGMII to ports 4-7.

Then it is not related to the bindings.

> 
> I see your point though. I'll drop "currently" and have it match the
> wording of the other drivers.

Drop entirely that sentence. One, chosen implementation in a very
specific moment should not be referred by bindings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof