[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <edfe5f4c-70fa-5fcc-868f-497c428445f1@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 13:36:52 -0500
From: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor idle: Practically limit "Dummy wait"
workaround to old Intel systems
On 9/22/22 2:01 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 9/22/22 11:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>
>> or do you want me to pick this up?
>
> I'll just stick it in x86/urgent.
>
> It's modifying code in a x86 #ifdef. I'll call it a small enclave of
> sovereign x86 territory in ACPI land, just like an embassy. ;)
Can it be cc:stable@...r.kernel.org, since it applies cleanly as far
back as this v5.4 commit?:
commit fa583f71a99c85e52781ed877c82c8757437b680
Author: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@...el.com>
Date: Thu Oct 24 15:04:20 2019 +0800
ACPI: processor_idle: Skip dummy wait if kernel is in guest
Thanks,
Kim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists