linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor idle: Practically limit "Dummy wait" workaround to old Intel systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:49:46 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor idle: Practically limit "Dummy wait"
 workaround to old Intel systems

On 9/23/22 11:36, Kim Phillips wrote:
> Can it be cc:stable@...r.kernel.org, since it applies cleanly as far
> back as this v5.4 commit?:

I just sent the pull request to Linus for this fix.  I realized that I
didn't tag it for stable@.  If it gets applied, I'll send a request for
it to be picked up for stable@, via "Option 2":

> Option 2
> ********
> 
> After the patch has been merged to Linus' tree, send an email to
> stable@...r.kernel.org containing the subject of the patch, the commit ID,
> why you think it should be applied, and what kernel version you wish it to
> be applied to.

Sorry about that.