[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95e4a84f-dcc6-72cd-69a0-3ba59ea73a9c@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:12:03 +0800
From: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <jirislaby@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] tty: moxa: add missing pci_disable_device()
On 2022/9/23 17:56, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 05:25:30PM +0800, ruanjinjie wrote:
>> Driver should call pci_disable_device() if it returns from
>> moxa_pci_probe() with error.
>
> Why?
>
> That is not a normal thing to do, as you can disable other PCI devices
> attached to it, right?
>
>> Meanwhile, the driver calls pci_enable_device() in
>> moxa_pci_probe(), but never calls pci_disable_device() during removal.
>
> And is that really a problem?
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: ruanjinjie <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/moxa.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Do you have this hardware to test with?
>
> How did you find this issue?
>
We use static analysis via coccinelle to find the above issue. The
command we use is below:
spatch -I include -timeout 60 -very_quiet -sp_file
pci_disable_device_missing.cocci drivers/tty/moxa.c
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists