[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOH5QeBiSEe03KNge9voJ-HjKbNLDoeY2PfKC7HE7F6z-92d7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 22:32:32 +0800
From: yong w <yongw.pur@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, jaewon31.kim@...sung.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, wang.yong12@....com.cn,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 stable-4.19 1/3] mm/page_alloc: use ac->high_zoneidx
for classzone_idx
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> 于2022年9月25日周日 19:00写道:
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 03:35:27AM -0700, wangyong wrote:
> > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> >
> > [ backport of commit 3334a45eb9e2bb040c880ef65e1d72357a0a008b ]
>
> This is from 5.8. What about the 5.4.y kernel? Why would someone
> upgrading from 4.19.y to 5.4.y suffer a regression here?
>
I encountered this problem on 4.19, but I haven't encountered it on 5.4.
However, this should be a common problem, so 5.4 may also need to be
merged.
Hello, Joonsoo, what do you think?
> And why wouldn't someone who has this issue just not use 5.10.y instead?
> What prevents someone from moving off of 4.19.y at this point in time?
>
This is a solution, but upgrading the kernel version requires time and overhead,
so use the patch is the most effective way, if there is.
Thanks.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists