[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220926103631.8cb144a6d0b683915b0ecb10@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:36:31 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Vasily Averin <vvs@...nvz.org>,
Anatoly Pugachev <matorola@...il.com>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
kernel@...nvz.org,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Sparc kernel list <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [sparc64] fails to boot, (was: Re: [PATCH memcg v6] net: set
proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations)
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:32:49 -0700 Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
> > Forgive my uniformed chime-in but Linus seemed happy with the size of
> > -rc7 and now I'm worried there won't be an -rc8. AFAICT this is a 6.0
> > regression. Vasily, Shakeel, do we have a plan to fix this?
>
> I was actually waiting for Vasily to respond. Anyways, I think the
> easiest way to proceed is to revert the commit 1d0403d20f6c ("net: set
> proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations"). We can debug the issue
> in the next cycle.
If agreeable, could someone please send along a tested and changelogged
patch to do this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists