[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzH01+6fErqu2Roo@fedora>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:52:07 +0100
From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: steven.price@....com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, Jason@...c4.com
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] kernel/cpu: Convert snprintf() to scnprintf()
Coccinnelle reports a warning
Warning: Use scnprintf or sprintf
Adding to that, there has been a slow migration from snprintf to scnprintf.
This LWN article explains the rationale for this change
https: //lwn.net/Articles/69419/
Ie. snprintf() returns what *would* be the resulting length,
while scnprintf() returns the actual length.
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
---
kernel/cpu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index bbad5e375d3b..f358d89c9580 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -2512,7 +2512,7 @@ static ssize_t control_show(struct device *dev,
{
const char *state = smt_states[cpu_smt_control];
- return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "%s\n", state);
+ return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "%s\n", state);
}
static ssize_t control_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
@@ -2525,7 +2525,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(control);
static ssize_t active_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
- return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "%d\n", sched_smt_active());
+ return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "%d\n", sched_smt_active());
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(active);
--
2.37.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists