linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 29/30] thermal/intel/int340x: Replace parameter to simplify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 23:33:01 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 29/30] thermal/intel/int340x: Replace parameter to
 simplify


Hi Nathan,

On 26/09/2022 19:05, Nathan Chancellor wrote:

[ ... ]

>> +	int34x_thermal_zone->ops = kmemdup(&int340x_thermal_zone_ops,
>> +					   sizeof(int340x_thermal_zone_ops), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!int34x_thermal_zone->ops)
>> +		goto err_ops_alloc;
> 
> I assume I was cc'd on this change due to my fix up patch:

> https://lore.kernel.org/20220923152009.1721739-1-nathan@kernel.org/

Yes, right, thanks for sending the fix.

> However, I don't see that applied here. I don't mind it being squashed
> in to keep the build as clean as possible through bisects.

Ok, that makes sense, I will merge with the change it fixes

> Additionally, I did a diff of v4 to v5 to apply on top of next-20220923
> and I noticed there were a significant number of places where there was
> whitespace added where it probably should not have been. 

Yeah, my git configuration does always trim the extra whitespaces when 
applying so I usually don't pay attention to that, but thanks for 
letting me know. I've probably something wrong with my emacs indentation 
setup

> Other than
> that, v5 works on all the machines that had issues so thank you for the
> quick fix!

Thanks for testing



-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog