[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee9ea160-ae77-112b-5302-74179e372387@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 00:11:49 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/30] thermal/core: Add a generic
thermal_zone_set_trip() function
On 26/09/2022 21:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[ ... ]
>> + if ((t.temperature != trip->temperature) && tz->ops->set_trip_temp) {
>
> The inner parens are not needed here and below.
>
>> +
>
> And the extra empty line is not needed here (and below) too IMO.
>
>> + ret = tz->ops->set_trip_temp(tz, trip_id, trip->temperature);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>
Without the parens, the following happens:
warning: this ‘if’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
1229 | if ((t.temperature != trip->temperature) &&
tz->ops->set_trip_temp)
| ^~
note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if
it were guarded by the ‘if’
1231 | if (ret)
| ^~
>> + if ((t.hysteresis != trip->hysteresis) && tz->ops->set_trip_hyst) {
>> +
>> + ret = tz->ops->set_trip_hyst(tz, trip_id, trip->hysteresis);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (((t.temperature != trip->temperature) ||
>> + (t.hysteresis != trip->hysteresis)) && tz->trips)
>> + tz->trips[trip_id] = *trip;
>
> I would write this as
>
> if (tz->trips && (t.temperature != trip->temperature || t.hysteresis
> != trip->hysteresis))
> tz->trips[trip_id] = *trip;
Ok, sure
> But
>
> 1. Do we want to copy the trip type here too?
The function thermal_zone_set_trip() is called from thermal_sysfs.c, it
is the unique call site. However, I think it is a good idea to check the
type of the trip point is not changed, even if it is not possible with
the actual code.
> 2. If tz->trips is set, do we still want to invoke ->set_trip_temp()
> or ->set_trip_hyst() if they are present?
No but there are bogus drivers setting the interrupt with these ops
instead of using the set_trips ops (eg. [1][2][3]). So in order to keep
those working ATM, I'm keeping them and when all the drivers will be
changed, I'll wipe out the set_trip_* ops from everywhere.
[1] drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
[2] drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-temp-alarm.c
[3] drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists