[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1841f368-e9db-1662-e950-c162a6b17f75@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:48:37 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, bhupesh.linux@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vkoul@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: dma: Make minor fixes to qcom,bam-dma
binding doc
On 25/09/2022 21:55, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>
> On 9/18/22 2:19 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 18/09/2022 09:11, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>>> As a user recently noted, the qcom,bam-dma binding document
>>> describes the BAM DMA node incorrectly.
>>
>> It's a bit confusing - what is exactly incorrectly described by binding?
>> You did not make any changes to the binding itself...
>
> Sorry for the late reply. Your comment just skipped through my mail
> filters :(
>
> I understand your point. I should have made the commit message more
> descriptive (infact now I look at it, I see some key words are actually
> missing from the commit message).
>
> The commit message should infact read as:
>
> "As a user recently noted, the qcom,bam-dma binding document
> describes the BAM DMA node *in the example section* incorrectly. Fix the
OK, now it makes sense :)
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists