linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: dma: Make minor fixes to qcom,bam-dma binding doc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:48:37 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, bhupesh.linux@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vkoul@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: dma: Make minor fixes to qcom,bam-dma
 binding doc

On 25/09/2022 21:55, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> 
> On 9/18/22 2:19 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 18/09/2022 09:11, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>>> As a user recently noted, the qcom,bam-dma binding document
>>> describes the BAM DMA node incorrectly.
>>
>> It's a bit confusing - what is exactly incorrectly described by binding?
>> You did not make any changes to the binding itself...
> 
> Sorry for the late reply. Your comment just skipped through my mail 
> filters :(
> 
> I understand your point. I should have made the commit message more 
> descriptive (infact now I look at it, I see some key words are actually 
> missing from the commit message).
> 
> The commit message should infact read as:
> 
> "As a user recently noted, the qcom,bam-dma binding document
> describes the BAM DMA node *in the example section* incorrectly. Fix the 

OK, now it makes sense :)


Best regards,
Krzysztof