linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: vgic: Remove duplicate check in update_affinity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:45:41 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        will@...nel.org, eric.auger@...hat.com, yuzhe@...china.com,
        oliver.upton@...ux.dev, shan.gavin@...il.com,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <Alexandru.Elisei@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: vgic: Remove duplicate check in update_affinity_collection()

On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:21:08 +0100,
Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Marc,
> 
> On 9/24/22 9:56 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Side note: please make sure you always Cc all the KVM/arm64 reviewers
> > when sending patches (now added).
> > 
> 
> Sure. The reason, why I didn't run './scripts/get_maintainer.pl' to get
> all reviewers, is the patch is super simple one :)

Sure, but the whole point of having multiple reviewers is to share the
review load. If you only send it to a reduced number of them, you are
defeating this process (although this is more wishful thinking than a
process...).

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.