[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5bf565a4-5bc4-42f8-59c0-8b908a9c2ab6@loongson.cn>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:10:30 +0800
From: Jun Yi <yijun@...ngson.cn>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn>,
Mao Bibo <maobibo@...ngson.cn>,
Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] LoongArch: Fixup do_ri csr_era
do_ri is porting from mips, mipsr6 use do_ri to emulate some fp
instructions, but Loongarch do not need to emulate these instructions.
And the regs->csr_era be always recovered to ths old_era =
regs->csr_era, so the compute_return_era is useless.
On 9/27/22 07:41, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 8:27 PM Jun Yi <yijun@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>>
>> csr_era of pt_regs in do_ri should not add 4 to point to the
>> next instruction.
> The comment does not make sense. I think it wants to skip some
> instructions, but your patch broke that.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@...ngson.cn>
>> ---
>> arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c
>> index aa1c95aaf595..ec888eda3d45 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/traps.c
>> @@ -477,8 +477,6 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr do_ri(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>
>> die_if_kernel("Reserved instruction in kernel code", regs);
>>
>> - compute_return_era(regs);
>> -
>> if (unlikely(get_user(opcode, era) < 0)) {
>> status = SIGSEGV;
>> current->thread.error_code = 1;
>> --
>> 2.31.1
>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists