linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.19 014/207] Revert "usb: add quirks for Lenovo OneLink+ Dock"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 08:18:26 +0200
From:   Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
        Jean-Francois Le Fillatre <jflf_kernel@....com>,
        stable <stable@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 014/207] Revert "usb: add quirks for Lenovo OneLink+
 Dock"

On 27. 09. 22, 7:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 07:23:46AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> I wonder, does it make sense to queue the commit (as 011/207) and
>> immediately its revert (the patch below) in a single release? I doubt
>> that...
>>
>> The same holds for 012 (patch) + 015 (revert).
> 
> Yes it does, otherwise tools will pick up "hey, you forgot this patch
> that should have been applied here!" all the time.  Having the patch,
> and the revert, in the tree prevents that from happening.

It'd be fairly easy to fix the tools not to pick up reverted commits, right?

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs