linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.19 014/207] Revert "usb: add quirks for Lenovo OneLink+ Dock"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:47:34 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
        Jean-Francois Le Fillatre <jflf_kernel@....com>,
        stable <stable@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 014/207] Revert "usb: add quirks for Lenovo OneLink+
 Dock"

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 07:23:46AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> I wonder, does it make sense to queue the commit (as 011/207) and
> immediately its revert (the patch below) in a single release? I doubt
> that...
> 
> The same holds for 012 (patch) + 015 (revert).

Yes it does, otherwise tools will pick up "hey, you forgot this patch
that should have been applied here!" all the time.  Having the patch,
and the revert, in the tree prevents that from happening.

thanks,

greg k-h