linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Reflect current CoC interpretation and practices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dd89a30e-5403-8844-036c-9c9107cac888@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:19:29 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Reflect current CoC interpretation and
 practices

On 9/27/22 04:11, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> The Code of Conduct interpretation does not reflect the current
> practices of the CoC committee or the TAB. Update the documentation
> to remove references to initial committees and boot strap periods
> since it is past that time, and note that the this document
> does serve as the documentation for the CoC committee processes.
> 

When was the bootstrap period be concluded?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara