linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Reflect current CoC interpretation and practices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YzKyqNJk72TY//42@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:22:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc:     Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Reflect current CoC interpretation
 and practices

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 03:19:29PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On 9/27/22 04:11, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> > The Code of Conduct interpretation does not reflect the current
> > practices of the CoC committee or the TAB. Update the documentation
> > to remove references to initial committees and boot strap periods
> > since it is past that time, and note that the this document
> > does serve as the documentation for the CoC committee processes.
> > 
> 
> When was the bootstrap period be concluded?

I do not understand the question, sorry.  What exactly are you asking
here?

confused,

greg k-h