linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 3/5] selftests/resctrl: Remove duplicate codes that clear each test result file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <TYAPR01MB6330988D96E4CD00C9A03DAA8B559@TYAPR01MB6330.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:01:46 +0000
From:   "tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com" <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>
To:     'Reinette Chatre' <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] selftests/resctrl: Remove duplicate codes that clear
 each test result file

Hi Reinette,

> On 9/13/2022 6:51 PM, Shaopeng Tan wrote:
> > Before exiting each test function(run_cmt/cat/mbm/mba_test()),
> > test results are printed by ksft_print_msg() and then temporary result
> > files are cleaned by function cmt/cat/mbm/mba_test_cleanup().
> > However, before running ksft_print_msg(), function
> 
> before -> after?

I think it is "before".

> > cmt/cat/mbm/mba_test_cleanup()
> > has been run in each test function as follows:
> >   cmt_resctrl_val()
> >   cat_perf_miss_val()
> >   mba_schemata_change()
> >   mbm_bw_change()
> >
> > Remove duplicate codes that clear each test result file.
> >
> 
> Another good catch, thank you.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c | 1 -
> > tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c | 2 --
> > tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c | 2 --
> > tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c | 2 --
> >  4 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> > index 1c5e90c63254..d1134f66469f 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> > @@ -221,7 +221,6 @@ int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int n, char
> *cache_type)
> >  		kill(bm_pid, SIGKILL);
> >  	}
> >
> > -	cat_test_cleanup();
> >  	if (bm_pid)
> >  		umount_resctrlfs();
> >
> 
> It makes it much easier to understand code if it is symmetrical. Since the files
> are created within cat_perf_miss_val() I think it would be better to perform the
> cleanup in the same function. So, keep this cleanup but remove the call from
> run_cat_test() instead.
> 
> Similar for the cleanups below ... could you please keep them and instead
> remove the duplicate cleanup from run_cmt/mbm/mba_test() instead?
> 
> When you do so, please be careful since it seems that there is (another!) bug
> where the cleanup is not done if the test fails.

Thanks for your advices, I will remove the duplicate cleanups from run_cmt/mbm/mba_test().

Best Regards,
Shaopeng

> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> > index 8968e36db99d..b3b17fb876f4 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> > @@ -139,7 +139,5 @@ int cmt_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char
> **benchmark_cmd)
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >
> > -	cmt_test_cleanup();
> > -
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
> > index 1a1bdb6180cf..93ffacb416df 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
> > @@ -166,7 +166,5 @@ int mba_schemata_change(int cpu_no, char
> *bw_report, char **benchmark_cmd)
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >
> > -	mba_test_cleanup();
> > -
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> > index 38a3b3ad1c76..a453db4c221f 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> > @@ -134,7 +134,5 @@ int mbm_bw_change(int span, int cpu_no, char
> *bw_report, char **benchmark_cmd)
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >
> > -	mbm_test_cleanup();
> > -
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Reinette