linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Reflect current CoC interpretation and practices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c5099b4d-eb37-a210-b852-51e02c185a87@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:08:11 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CoC: Reflect current CoC interpretation and
 practices

On 9/27/22 15:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> In the patch, the mention to bootstrap period of CoC committee is
>> replaced with note about dynamic nature of CoC interpretation. I asked
>> when the duration of bootstrap period was before we got into status quo.
> 
> It was a while ago, a few years perhaps?  We had forgotten to update the
> document since then, sorry.
> 
> greg k-h

Thanks Greg for the info!

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara