[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzLnmGiU7qcWkeH2@lpieralisi>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:07:52 +0200
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: cgel.zte@...il.com, robh@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, rjui@...adcom.com, sbranden@...adcom.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] PCI: iproc: Remove the unneeded result
variable
[+Greg]
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 04:25:20PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 07:16:36AM +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> > From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
> >
> > Return the value iproc_pcie_setup_ib() directly instead of storing it in
> > another redundant variable.
> >
> > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> > Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
>
> This patch itself is fine, but was posted by cgel.zte@...il.com, not by
> "ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>", so it needs another signoff
> and full name so the chain is complete. For more details see:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=v5.18#n363
Greg, Bjorn,
I believe that appending a SoB like this myself is fine:
Signed-off-by: CGEL ZTE <cgel.zte@...il.com>
It is a SOB already in kernel commit logs - I assume
that's the right thing to do in this case, please
let me know if it isn't and what should we do instead.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> Bjorn
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists