[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220928210512.642594-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:05:12 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] x86, mem: move memmove to out of line assembler
When building ARCH=i386 with CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_FULL=y, it's possible
(depending on additional configs which I have not been able to isolate)
to observe a failure during register allocation:
error: inline assembly requires more registers than available
when memmove is inlined into tcp_v4_fill_cb() or tcp_v6_fill_cb().
memmove is quite large and probably shouldn't be inlined due to size
alone. A noinline function attribute would be the simplest fix, but
there's a few things that stand out with the current definition:
In addition to having complex constraints that can't always be resolved,
the clobber list seems to be missing %bx and %dx, and possibly %cl. By
using numbered operands rather than symbolic operands, the constraints
are quite obnoxious to refactor.
Having a large function be 99% inline asm is a code smell that this
function should simply be written in stand-alone out-of-line assembler.
That gives the opportunity for other cleanups like fixing the
inconsistent use of tabs vs spaces and instruction suffixes, and the
label 3 appearing twice. Symbolic operands and local labels would
provide this code with a fresh coat of paint.
Moving this to out of line assembler guarantees that the
compiler cannot inline calls to memmove.
This has been done previously for 64b:
commit 9599ec0471de ("x86-64, mem: Convert memmove() to assembly file
and fix return value bug")
Also, add a test that tickles the `rep movsl` implementation to test it
for correctness, since it has implicit operands.
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
---
Changes v3 -> v4:
* Fix bug I introduced in v1 when I changed src and dest to use
different scratch registers, which breaks `rep movsl` as pointed out
by Rasmus. This requires 2 `movl`s earlier on, changing the tmp
registers, then adjusting which registers we save/restore by the
calling convention. I intentionally did not carry forward tags from
Kees from v3 due to this bug.
* Add a Kunit test that hangs on v3, but passes on v4. It uses a few
magic constants as well in order to test the `rep movsl` paths.
Changes v2 -> v3:
* Fix bug I introduced in v1 when I changed one of temp register
operands for one of the two instructions performing a mem to mem swap,
but not the other instruction's operand, and discovered by Kees.
Verified KUnit memcpy tests are passing via:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=i386 --make_options LLVM=1
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=i386
Fixed by using symbolic identifiers rather than open coded registers
for the less-than-word-size temporary registers.
* Expand the comment about callee saved registers on i386 with a
reference to the psABI.
Changes v1 -> v2:
* Add reference to 9599ec0471de in commit message.
* Include asm/export.h then make sure to EXPORT_SYMBOL(memmove).
arch/x86/lib/Makefile | 1 +
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_32.c | 187 -------------------------------
arch/x86/lib/memmove_32.S | 226 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/memcpy_kunit.c | 21 ++++
4 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 187 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/memmove_32.S
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
index f76747862bd2..9a0b8ed782e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_32),y)
lib-y += checksum_32.o
lib-y += strstr_32.o
lib-y += string_32.o
+ lib-y += memmove_32.o
ifneq ($(CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64),y)
lib-y += cmpxchg8b_emu.o atomic64_386_32.o
endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_32.c b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_32.c
index ef3af7ff2c8a..a29b64befb93 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_32.c
@@ -17,190 +17,3 @@ __visible void *memset(void *s, int c, size_t count)
return __memset(s, c, count);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(memset);
-
-__visible void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n)
-{
- int d0,d1,d2,d3,d4,d5;
- char *ret = dest;
-
- __asm__ __volatile__(
- /* Handle more 16 bytes in loop */
- "cmp $0x10, %0\n\t"
- "jb 1f\n\t"
-
- /* Decide forward/backward copy mode */
- "cmp %2, %1\n\t"
- "jb 2f\n\t"
-
- /*
- * movs instruction have many startup latency
- * so we handle small size by general register.
- */
- "cmp $680, %0\n\t"
- "jb 3f\n\t"
- /*
- * movs instruction is only good for aligned case.
- */
- "mov %1, %3\n\t"
- "xor %2, %3\n\t"
- "and $0xff, %3\n\t"
- "jz 4f\n\t"
- "3:\n\t"
- "sub $0x10, %0\n\t"
-
- /*
- * We gobble 16 bytes forward in each loop.
- */
- "3:\n\t"
- "sub $0x10, %0\n\t"
- "mov 0*4(%1), %3\n\t"
- "mov 1*4(%1), %4\n\t"
- "mov %3, 0*4(%2)\n\t"
- "mov %4, 1*4(%2)\n\t"
- "mov 2*4(%1), %3\n\t"
- "mov 3*4(%1), %4\n\t"
- "mov %3, 2*4(%2)\n\t"
- "mov %4, 3*4(%2)\n\t"
- "lea 0x10(%1), %1\n\t"
- "lea 0x10(%2), %2\n\t"
- "jae 3b\n\t"
- "add $0x10, %0\n\t"
- "jmp 1f\n\t"
-
- /*
- * Handle data forward by movs.
- */
- ".p2align 4\n\t"
- "4:\n\t"
- "mov -4(%1, %0), %3\n\t"
- "lea -4(%2, %0), %4\n\t"
- "shr $2, %0\n\t"
- "rep movsl\n\t"
- "mov %3, (%4)\n\t"
- "jmp 11f\n\t"
- /*
- * Handle data backward by movs.
- */
- ".p2align 4\n\t"
- "6:\n\t"
- "mov (%1), %3\n\t"
- "mov %2, %4\n\t"
- "lea -4(%1, %0), %1\n\t"
- "lea -4(%2, %0), %2\n\t"
- "shr $2, %0\n\t"
- "std\n\t"
- "rep movsl\n\t"
- "mov %3,(%4)\n\t"
- "cld\n\t"
- "jmp 11f\n\t"
-
- /*
- * Start to prepare for backward copy.
- */
- ".p2align 4\n\t"
- "2:\n\t"
- "cmp $680, %0\n\t"
- "jb 5f\n\t"
- "mov %1, %3\n\t"
- "xor %2, %3\n\t"
- "and $0xff, %3\n\t"
- "jz 6b\n\t"
-
- /*
- * Calculate copy position to tail.
- */
- "5:\n\t"
- "add %0, %1\n\t"
- "add %0, %2\n\t"
- "sub $0x10, %0\n\t"
-
- /*
- * We gobble 16 bytes backward in each loop.
- */
- "7:\n\t"
- "sub $0x10, %0\n\t"
-
- "mov -1*4(%1), %3\n\t"
- "mov -2*4(%1), %4\n\t"
- "mov %3, -1*4(%2)\n\t"
- "mov %4, -2*4(%2)\n\t"
- "mov -3*4(%1), %3\n\t"
- "mov -4*4(%1), %4\n\t"
- "mov %3, -3*4(%2)\n\t"
- "mov %4, -4*4(%2)\n\t"
- "lea -0x10(%1), %1\n\t"
- "lea -0x10(%2), %2\n\t"
- "jae 7b\n\t"
- /*
- * Calculate copy position to head.
- */
- "add $0x10, %0\n\t"
- "sub %0, %1\n\t"
- "sub %0, %2\n\t"
-
- /*
- * Move data from 8 bytes to 15 bytes.
- */
- ".p2align 4\n\t"
- "1:\n\t"
- "cmp $8, %0\n\t"
- "jb 8f\n\t"
- "mov 0*4(%1), %3\n\t"
- "mov 1*4(%1), %4\n\t"
- "mov -2*4(%1, %0), %5\n\t"
- "mov -1*4(%1, %0), %1\n\t"
-
- "mov %3, 0*4(%2)\n\t"
- "mov %4, 1*4(%2)\n\t"
- "mov %5, -2*4(%2, %0)\n\t"
- "mov %1, -1*4(%2, %0)\n\t"
- "jmp 11f\n\t"
-
- /*
- * Move data from 4 bytes to 7 bytes.
- */
- ".p2align 4\n\t"
- "8:\n\t"
- "cmp $4, %0\n\t"
- "jb 9f\n\t"
- "mov 0*4(%1), %3\n\t"
- "mov -1*4(%1, %0), %4\n\t"
- "mov %3, 0*4(%2)\n\t"
- "mov %4, -1*4(%2, %0)\n\t"
- "jmp 11f\n\t"
-
- /*
- * Move data from 2 bytes to 3 bytes.
- */
- ".p2align 4\n\t"
- "9:\n\t"
- "cmp $2, %0\n\t"
- "jb 10f\n\t"
- "movw 0*2(%1), %%dx\n\t"
- "movw -1*2(%1, %0), %%bx\n\t"
- "movw %%dx, 0*2(%2)\n\t"
- "movw %%bx, -1*2(%2, %0)\n\t"
- "jmp 11f\n\t"
-
- /*
- * Move data for 1 byte.
- */
- ".p2align 4\n\t"
- "10:\n\t"
- "cmp $1, %0\n\t"
- "jb 11f\n\t"
- "movb (%1), %%cl\n\t"
- "movb %%cl, (%2)\n\t"
- ".p2align 4\n\t"
- "11:"
- : "=&c" (d0), "=&S" (d1), "=&D" (d2),
- "=r" (d3),"=r" (d4), "=r"(d5)
- :"0" (n),
- "1" (src),
- "2" (dest)
- :"memory");
-
- return ret;
-
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(memmove);
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/memmove_32.S b/arch/x86/lib/memmove_32.S
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..35d9dd24624e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/memmove_32.S
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+
+#include <linux/linkage.h>
+#include <asm/export.h>
+
+SYM_FUNC_START(memmove)
+/*
+ * void *memmove(void *dest_in, const void *src_in, size_t n)
+ * -mregparm=3 passes these in registers:
+ * dest_in: %eax
+ * src_in: %edx
+ * n: %ecx
+ *
+ * n can remain in %ecx, but for `rep movsl`, we'll need dest in %edi and src
+ * in %esi.
+ */
+.set dest_in, %eax
+.set dest, %edi
+.set src_in, %edx
+.set src, %esi
+.set n, %ecx
+
+/*
+ * Need 3 scratch registers. These need to be saved+restored. Section 3.2.1
+ * Footnote 7 of the System V Application Binary Interface Version 1.0 aka
+ * "psABI" notes:
+ * Note that in contrast to the Intel386 ABI, %rdi, and %rsi belong to the
+ * called function, not the caller.
+ * i.e. %edi and %esi are callee saved for i386 (because they belong to the
+ * caller).
+ */
+.set tmp0, %edx
+.set tmp0w, %dx
+.set tmp1, %ebx
+.set tmp1w, %bx
+.set tmp2, %eax
+.set tmp3b, %cl
+
+ pushl %ebp
+ movl %esp, %ebp
+
+ pushl dest_in
+ pushl dest
+ pushl src
+ pushl tmp1
+
+ movl src_in, src
+ movl dest_in, dest
+
+ /* Handle more 16 bytes in loop */
+ cmpl $0x10, n
+ jb .L16_byteswap
+
+ /* Decide forward/backward copy mode */
+ cmpl dest, src
+ jb .Lbackwards_header
+
+ /*
+ * movs instruction have many startup latency
+ * so we handle small size by general register.
+ */
+ cmpl $680, n
+ jb .Ltoo_small_forwards
+ /*
+ * movs instruction is only good for aligned case.
+ */
+ movl src, tmp0
+ xorl dest, tmp0
+ andl $0xff, tmp0
+ jz .Lforward_movs
+.Ltoo_small_forwards:
+ subl $0x10, n
+
+ /*
+ * We gobble 16 bytes forward in each loop.
+ */
+.L16_byteswap_forwards_loop:
+ subl $0x10, n
+ movl 0*4(src), tmp0
+ movl 1*4(src), tmp1
+ movl tmp0, 0*4(dest)
+ movl tmp1, 1*4(dest)
+ movl 2*4(src), tmp0
+ movl 3*4(src), tmp1
+ movl tmp0, 2*4(dest)
+ movl tmp1, 3*4(dest)
+ leal 0x10(src), src
+ leal 0x10(dest), dest
+ jae .L16_byteswap_forwards_loop
+ addl $0x10, n
+ jmp .L16_byteswap
+
+ /*
+ * Handle data forward by movs.
+ */
+.p2align 4
+.Lforward_movs:
+ movl -4(src, n), tmp0
+ leal -4(dest, n), tmp1
+ shrl $2, n
+ rep movsl
+ movl tmp0, (tmp1)
+ jmp .Ldone
+ /*
+ * Handle data backward by movs.
+ */
+.p2align 4
+.Lbackwards_movs:
+ movl (src), tmp0
+ movl dest, tmp1
+ leal -4(src, n), src
+ leal -4(dest, n), dest
+ shrl $2, n
+ std
+ rep movsl
+ movl tmp0,(tmp1)
+ cld
+ jmp .Ldone
+
+ /*
+ * Start to prepare for backward copy.
+ */
+.p2align 4
+.Lbackwards_header:
+ cmpl $680, n
+ jb .Ltoo_small_backwards
+ movl src, tmp0
+ xorl dest, tmp0
+ andl $0xff, tmp0
+ jz .Lbackwards_movs
+
+ /*
+ * Calculate copy position to tail.
+ */
+.Ltoo_small_backwards:
+ addl n, src
+ addl n, dest
+ subl $0x10, n
+
+ /*
+ * We gobble 16 bytes backward in each loop.
+ */
+.L16_byteswap_backwards_loop:
+ subl $0x10, n
+
+ movl -1*4(src), tmp0
+ movl -2*4(src), tmp1
+ movl tmp0, -1*4(dest)
+ movl tmp1, -2*4(dest)
+ movl -3*4(src), tmp0
+ movl -4*4(src), tmp1
+ movl tmp0, -3*4(dest)
+ movl tmp1, -4*4(dest)
+ leal -0x10(src), src
+ leal -0x10(dest), dest
+ jae .L16_byteswap_backwards_loop
+ /*
+ * Calculate copy position to head.
+ */
+ addl $0x10, n
+ subl n, src
+ subl n, dest
+
+ /*
+ * Move data from 8 bytes to 15 bytes.
+ */
+.p2align 4
+.L16_byteswap:
+ cmpl $8, n
+ jb .L8_byteswap
+ movl 0*4(src), tmp0
+ movl 1*4(src), tmp1
+ movl -2*4(src, n), tmp2
+ movl -1*4(src, n), src
+
+ movl tmp0, 0*4(dest)
+ movl tmp1, 1*4(dest)
+ movl tmp2, -2*4(dest, n)
+ movl src, -1*4(dest, n)
+ jmp .Ldone
+
+ /*
+ * Move data from 4 bytes to 7 bytes.
+ */
+.p2align 4
+.L8_byteswap:
+ cmpl $4, n
+ jb .L4_byteswap
+ movl 0*4(src), tmp0
+ movl -1*4(src, n), tmp1
+ movl tmp0, 0*4(dest)
+ movl tmp1, -1*4(dest, n)
+ jmp .Ldone
+
+ /*
+ * Move data from 2 bytes to 3 bytes.
+ */
+.p2align 4
+.L4_byteswap:
+ cmpl $2, n
+ jb .Lbyteswap
+ movw 0*2(src), tmp0w
+ movw -1*2(src, n), tmp1w
+ movw tmp0w, 0*2(dest)
+ movw tmp1w, -1*2(dest, n)
+ jmp .Ldone
+
+ /*
+ * Move data for 1 byte.
+ */
+.p2align 4
+.Lbyteswap:
+ cmpl $1, n
+ jb .Ldone
+ movb (src), tmp3b
+ movb tmp3b, (dest)
+.p2align 4
+.Ldone:
+ popl tmp1
+ popl src
+ popl dest
+ popl %eax // memmove returns dest_in
+ popl %ebp
+ RET
+SYM_FUNC_END(memmove)
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(memmove)
diff --git a/lib/memcpy_kunit.c b/lib/memcpy_kunit.c
index 62f8ffcbbaa3..52bce4f697a5 100644
--- a/lib/memcpy_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/memcpy_kunit.c
@@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ static void memcpy_test(struct kunit *test)
#undef TEST_OP
}
+static unsigned char larger_array [2048];
+
static void memmove_test(struct kunit *test)
{
#define TEST_OP "memmove"
@@ -181,6 +183,25 @@ static void memmove_test(struct kunit *test)
ptr = &overlap.data[2];
memmove(ptr, overlap.data, 5);
compare("overlapping write", overlap, overlap_expected);
+
+ /* Verify larger overlapping moves. */
+ larger_array[256] = 0xAAu;
+ /* Test a backwards overlapping memmove first. 256 and 1024 are
+ * important for i386 to use rep movsl.
+ */
+ memmove(larger_array, larger_array + 256, 1024);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, larger_array[0], 0xAAu);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, larger_array[256], 0x00);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test,
+ memchr(larger_array + 1, 0xaa, ARRAY_SIZE(larger_array) - 1));
+ /* Test a forwards overlapping memmove. */
+ larger_array[0] = 0xBBu;
+ memmove(larger_array + 256, larger_array, 1024);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, larger_array[0], 0xBBu);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, larger_array[256], 0xBBu);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, memchr(larger_array + 1, 0xBBu, 256 - 1));
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test,
+ memchr(larger_array + 257, 0xBBu, ARRAY_SIZE(larger_array) - 257));
#undef TEST_OP
}
--
2.37.3.998.g577e59143f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists