[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzTLdnlmkhfTZLqP@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 22:32:22 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, avagin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/fpu: Correct the legacy state offset and size
information
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> On 9/28/2022 2:06 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> > > index a3f7045d1f8e..ac2ec5d6e7e4 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> > > @@ -143,8 +143,13 @@ static unsigned int xfeature_get_offset(u64 xcomp_bv, int xfeature)
> > > * offsets.
> > > */
> > > if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_XCOMPACTED) ||
> > > - xfeature <= XFEATURE_SSE)
> > > + xfeature <= XFEATURE_SSE) {
> > > + if (xfeature <= XFEATURE_SSE)
> > > + pr_warn("The legacy state (%d) is discontiguously located.\n",
> > > + xfeature);
> >
> > pr_warn() here isn't warranted. copy_uabi_to_xstate() calls this with non-extended
> > features,
>
> I think patch1 makes changes not to call this for legacy features anymore.
Oh, even better! In that case, drop patch 3 and WARN here, because with that
call site gone, all paths that lead to xfeature_get_offset() avoid calling it
with legacy features.
The comment above this probably needs to be updated too.
I was going to make that suggestion in my original response, but I didn't apply
the series and so didn't see that that last remaining wart was fixed. Thanks,
and sorry for the runaround!
> > which is perfectly fine since it manually handles MXCSR. And that helper
> > is directly reachable by userspace, i.e. userspace can spam the pr_warn().
>
> I don't think I get your point. I assume that helper is __raw_xsave_addr().
> But then I'm missing how it can be directly reached by userspace.
ioctl(KVM_GET_XSAVE) can reach this code, i.e. if there were a bug then userspace
could invoke that ioctl() in a tight loop to spam the kernel log.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists