[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzdMWr84Z8mgbfWS@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:06:50 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: joe@...ches.com, keescook@...omium.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/2] SPDX: add copyleft-next-0.3.1
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:01:45PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> As suggested by Thomas Gleixner, I'm following up to move on with
> the SPDX tag needed for copyleft-next-0.3.1. I've split this out
> from the test_sysfs selftest so to separate review from that.
>
> Changes on this v10:
>
> o embraced paragraph from Thomas Gleixner which helps explain why
> the OR operator in the SPDX license name
> o dropped the GPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0+ tags as suggested by Thomas Gleixner
> as these are outdated (still valid) in the SPDX spec
> o trimmed the Cc list to remove the test_sysfs / block layer / fs folks as
> the test_sysfs stuff is now dropped from consideration in this series
>
> The last series was at v9 but it also had the test_sysfs and its
> changes, its history can be found here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211029184500.2821444-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/
>
> Luis Chamberlain (2):
> LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license
> testing: use the copyleft-next-0.3.1 SPDX tag
*poke*
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists