[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzfnqTlEbx5K7ehQ@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2022 09:09:29 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org,
joe@...ches.com, keescook@...omium.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/2] SPDX: add copyleft-next-0.3.1
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 01:06:50PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:01:45PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > As suggested by Thomas Gleixner, I'm following up to move on with
> > the SPDX tag needed for copyleft-next-0.3.1. I've split this out
> > from the test_sysfs selftest so to separate review from that.
> >
> > Changes on this v10:
> >
> > o embraced paragraph from Thomas Gleixner which helps explain why
> > the OR operator in the SPDX license name
> > o dropped the GPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0+ tags as suggested by Thomas Gleixner
> > as these are outdated (still valid) in the SPDX spec
> > o trimmed the Cc list to remove the test_sysfs / block layer / fs folks as
> > the test_sysfs stuff is now dropped from consideration in this series
> >
> > The last series was at v9 but it also had the test_sysfs and its
> > changes, its history can be found here:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211029184500.2821444-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/
> >
> > Luis Chamberlain (2):
> > LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license
> > testing: use the copyleft-next-0.3.1 SPDX tag
>
> *poke*
I was waiting for someone else to review this before considering it...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists