linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Prefer async probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEfrLckfRq99nShHgE5-2P0Wn7keprkR6W7SDa1FFna9e7Qmuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:45:36 +1000
From:   Mani Milani <mani@...omium.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Prefer async probe

Hi Jean,

No, there is nothing special about the 190ms. It is just what I
measured on my device under test. I decided to include it in the
commit message to give a rough idea on how much delay this driver
probe can be adding to boot time.

Thank you Jean and Wolfram for reviewing.

P.S:   Apologies for sending this twice! My previous message was
rejected by the mailing list due to containing HTML subparts. (fingers
crossed this time)