linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: ps8640: Add software to support aux defer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 07:20:33 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Jason Yen <jason.yen@...adetech.corp-partner.google.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: ps8640: Add software to support aux defer

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 9:25 PM Jason Yen
<jason.yen@...adetech.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
>
> This chip can not handle aux defer if the host directly program
> its aux registers to access edid/dpcd. So we need let software
> to handle the aux defer situation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Yen <jason.yen@...adetech.corp-partner.google.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Add aux defer handler
> - Remove incorrect statements
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> index 31e88cb39f8a..76ada237096d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> @@ -286,7 +286,6 @@ static ssize_t ps8640_aux_transfer_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
>         }
>
>         switch (data & SWAUX_STATUS_MASK) {
> -       /* Ignore the DEFER cases as they are already handled in hardware */
>         case SWAUX_STATUS_NACK:
>         case SWAUX_STATUS_I2C_NACK:
>                 /*
> @@ -303,6 +302,14 @@ static ssize_t ps8640_aux_transfer_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
>         case SWAUX_STATUS_ACKM:
>                 len = data & SWAUX_M_MASK;
>                 break;
> +       case SWAUX_STATUS_DEFER:
> +       case SWAUX_STATUS_I2C_DEFER:
> +               if (is_native_aux)
> +                       msg->reply |= DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_DEFER;
> +               else
> +                       msg->reply |= DP_AUX_I2C_REPLY_DEFER;
> +               len = data & SWAUX_M_MASK;
> +               break;

This seems fine to me now. There is nothing too controversial here but
I'll still give this a few days on the list for anyone else to speak
up. I'll plan to land it midway through next week unless anything
comes up.

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>