lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20221002192146.03993bb2@yoga.local.home> Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 19:21:46 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Artem S. Tashkinov" <aros@....com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>, workflows@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, ksummit@...ts.linux.dev, Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com> Subject: Re: Planned changes for bugzilla.kernel.org to reduce the "Bugzilla blues" On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 00:04:25 +0100 Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > And you keep moving along the same track - the usual reaction of some > company after having pulled back a bloody stump and enjoyed the pile of > explanations of the reasons why opt-out is *NOT* *ACCEPTABLE*, *EVER* > is along the lines of "OK, we'll just spam everyone in our database once > and ask them to opt-in - that must be OK, right?" But a single spam that can be ignored is so much better than being automatically added to something that you have to do work to get out of. We get spammed a lot to participate in surveys and such. But for those one time emails, they never bothered me. Sometimes, I actually do participate. -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists