lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 3 Oct 2022 16:02:46 +0900
From:   Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: remove dead and buggy code from
 sysfs_slab_add()

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 10:47:42AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> The function sysfs_slab_add() has two callers:
> 
> One is slab_sysfs_init(), which first initializes slab_kset, and only
> when that succeeds sets slab_state to FULL, and then proceeds to call
> sysfs_slab_add() for all previously created slabs.
> 
> The other is __kmem_cache_create(), but only after a
> 
> 	if (slab_state <= UP)
> 		return 0;
> 
> check.
> 
> So in other words, sysfs_slab_add() is never called without
> slab_kset (aka the return value of cache_kset()) being non-NULL.
> 
> And this is just as well, because if we ever did take this path and
> called kobject_init(&s->kobj), and then later when called again from
> slab_sysfs_init() would end up calling kobject_init_and_add(), we
> would hit
> 
> 	if (kobj->state_initialized) {
> 		/* do not error out as sometimes we can recover */
> 		pr_err("kobject (%p): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.\n",
> 		dump_stack();
> 	}
> 
> in kobject.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
> ---
>  mm/slub.c | 5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 4b98dff9be8e..04a7f75a7b1f 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -5937,11 +5937,6 @@ static int sysfs_slab_add(struct kmem_cache *s)
>  	struct kset *kset = cache_kset(s);
>  	int unmergeable = slab_unmergeable(s);
>  
> -	if (!kset) {
> -		kobject_init(&s->kobj, &slab_ktype);
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (!unmergeable && disable_higher_order_debug &&
>  			(slub_debug & DEBUG_METADATA_FLAGS))
>  		unmergeable = 1;
> -- 
> 2.37.2

I assumed that it's hit when SLUB failed to initialize slab_kset in
slab_sysfs_init(). (Yeah, it is too unlikely, though....)

And obviously it's a bug if sysfs_slab_add() is called early than
slab_sysfs_init().

-- 
Thanks,
Hyeonggon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ