linux-kernel - [PATCH -next] arm64: alternatives: Use vdso/bits.h instead of linux/bits.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221003193759.1141709-1-nathan@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon,  3 Oct 2022 12:37:59 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -next] arm64: alternatives: Use vdso/bits.h instead of linux/bits.h

When building with CONFIG_LTO after commit ba00c2a04fa5 ("arm64: fix the
build with binutils 2.27"), the following build error occurs:

  In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c:6:
  In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6:
  In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h:8:
  In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h:9:
  In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h:9:
  In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h:5:
  In file included from include/linux/bits.h:22:
  In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5:
  In file included from include/linux/compiler.h:248:
  In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:71:
  include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:67:9: error: expected string literal in 'asm'
          return __READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)addr);
                ^
  arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:43:16: note: expanded from macro '__READ_ONCE'
                  asm volatile(__LOAD_RCPC(b, %w0, %1)                    \
                              ^
  arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:17:2: note: expanded from macro '__LOAD_RCPC'
          ALTERNATIVE(                                                    \
          ^

Similar to the issue resolved by commit 0072dc1b53c3 ("arm64: avoid
BUILD_BUG_ON() in alternative-macros"), there is a circular include
dependency through <linux/bits.h> when CONFIG_LTO is enabled due to
<asm/rwonce.h> appearing in the include chain before the contents of
<asm/alternative-macros.h>, which results in ALTERNATIVE() not getting
expanded properly because it has not been defined yet.

Avoid this issue by including <vdso/bits.h>, which includes the
definition of the BIT() macro, instead of <linux/bits.h>, as BIT() is the
only macro from bits.h that is relevant to this header.

Fixes: ba00c2a04fa5 ("arm64: fix the build with binutils 2.27")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1728
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h
index b5ac0b85c9bb..3622e9f4fb44 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative-macros.h
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 #ifndef __ASM_ALTERNATIVE_MACROS_H
 #define __ASM_ALTERNATIVE_MACROS_H
 
-#include <linux/bits.h>
 #include <linux/const.h>
+#include <vdso/bits.h>
 
 #include <asm/cpucaps.h>
 #include <asm/insn-def.h>

base-commit: ba00c2a04fa5431d204a4183062b30372c062aa7
-- 
2.37.3