linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] clk: qcom: Add support for QDU1000 and QRU1000 RPMh clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <12e69213-c09d-fe48-8fa3-022a3e6f76cc@quicinc.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Oct 2022 14:40:11 -0500
From:   Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] clk: qcom: Add support for QDU1000 and QRU1000 RPMh
 clocks


On 10/1/2022 2:03 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 06:05, Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com> wrote:
>> Add support for RMPh clocks for QDU1000 and QRU1000 SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
>> index c07cab6905cb..27d11ffac71e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
>> @@ -628,6 +628,18 @@ static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sdx65 = {
>>         .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sdx65_rpmh_clocks),
>>  };
>>
>> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_ARC(qdru1000, bi_tcxo, bi_tcxo_ao, "xo.lvl", 0x3, 1);
>> +
>> +static struct clk_hw *qdru1000_rpmh_clocks[] = {
>> +       [RPMH_CXO_CLK]      = &qdru1000_bi_tcxo.hw,
>> +       [RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]    = &qdru1000_bi_tcxo_ao.hw,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_qdru1000 = {
>> +       .clks = qdru1000_rpmh_clocks,
>> +       .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(qdru1000_rpmh_clocks),
>> +};
>> +
>>  static struct clk_hw *of_clk_rpmh_hw_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec,
>>                                          void *data)
>>  {
>> @@ -723,6 +735,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id clk_rpmh_match_table[] = {
>>         { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8350},
>>         { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8450},
>>         { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sc7280},
>> +       { .compatible = "qcom,qdu1000-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_qdru1000},
>> +       { .compatible = "qcom,qru1000-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_qdru1000},
> Also the list isn't fully sorted, let's target that. Please move your
> compat strings into the beginning.
Sure thing.
>
>>         { }
>>  };
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, clk_rpmh_match_table);
>> --
>> 2.37.3
>>
Thanks,

Melody