[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221004024157.2470238-12-joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 02:41:57 +0000
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rushikesh.s.kadam@...el.com,
urezki@...il.com, neeraj.iitr10@...il.com, frederic@...nel.org,
paulmck@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, youssefesmat@...gle.com,
surenb@...gle.com, Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH v7 11/11] workqueue: Make queue_rcu_work() use call_rcu_flush()
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
call_rcu() changes to save power will slow down RCU workqueue items
queued via queue_rcu_work(). This may not be an issue, however we cannot
assume that workqueue users are OK with long delays. Use
call_rcu_flush() API instead which reverts to the old behavior.
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index aeea9731ef80..fe1146d97f1a 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1771,7 +1771,7 @@ bool queue_rcu_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq, struct rcu_work *rwork)
if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work))) {
rwork->wq = wq;
- call_rcu(&rwork->rcu, rcu_work_rcufn);
+ call_rcu_flush(&rwork->rcu, rcu_work_rcufn);
return true;
}
--
2.38.0.rc1.362.ged0d419d3c-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists