lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-a8eaa55b-16b0-4b17-b202-881e75a65eaf@palmer-ri-x1c9>
Date:   Mon, 03 Oct 2022 19:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:     nikita.shubin@...uefel.me, acme@...hat.com
CC:     linux@...ro.com, anup@...infault.org, acme@...nel.org,
        n.shubin@...ro.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, namhyung@...nel.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, peterz@...radead.org
Subject:     Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] RISC-V: Create unique identification for SoC PMU

On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 06:22:37 PDT (-0700), nikita.shubin@...uefel.me wrote:
> From: Nikita Shubin <n.shubin@...ro.com>
>
> This series aims to provide matching vendor SoC with corresponded JSON bindings.
>
> The ID string is proposed to be in form of MVENDORID-MARCHID-MIMPID, for example
> for Sifive Unmatched the corresponding string will be:
>
> 0x489-0x8000000000000007-0x[[:xdigit:]]+,v1,sifive/u74,core
>
> Where MIMPID can vary as all impl supported the same number of events, this might not
> be true for all future SoC however.
>
> Also added SBI firmware events pretty names, as any firmware that supports SBI PMU
> should also support firmare events [1].
>
> Series depends on patch by Anup Patel, exposing mvendor, marchid and mimpid
> to "/proc/cpuinfo" [2].
>
> [1] https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-sbi-doc/blob/master/riscv-sbi.adoc
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/7/27/23
>
> Link to previous version:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=653649
>
> See original cover letter by João Mário Domingos:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/cover/20211116154812.17008-1-joao.mario@tecnico.ulisboa.pt/
>
> Tested with the following OpenSBI device tree bindings:
>
> ```
> pmu {
>         compatible = "riscv,pmu";
>         riscv,event-to-mhpmcounters =
>                 <0x03 0x06 0x18
>                 0x10001 0x10002 0x18
>                 0x10009 0x10009 0x18
>                 0x10011 0x10011 0x18
>                 0x10019 0x10019 0x18
>                 0x10021 0x10021 0x18>;
>         riscv,event-to-mhpmevent =
>                 <0x03 0x00000000 0x1801
>                 0x04 0x00000000 0x0302
>                 0x05 0x00000000 0x4000
>                 0x06 0x00000000 0x6001
>                 0x10001 0x00000000 0x0202
>                 0x10002 0x00000000 0x0402
>                 0x10009 0x00000000 0x0102
>                 0x10011 0x00000000 0x2002
>                 0x10019 0x00000000 0x1002
>                 0x10021 0x00000000 0x0802>;
>         riscv,raw-event-to-mhpmcounters =
>                 <0x00000000 0x03ffff00 0x0 0x0 0x18
>                 0x00000000 0x0007ff01 0x0 0x1 0x18
>                 0x00000000 0x00003f02 0x0 0x2 0x18>;
> };
> ```
> ---
> v5->v6:
> Will Deacon:
> 	- dropped first patch from v5 series it has been merged into master
> Mayuresh Chitale:
> 	- fixed FW_SFENCE_VMA_SENT event code
>
> - added Tested-by tags
> ---
>
> Nikita Shubin (3):
>   perf arch events: riscv sbi firmware std event files
>   perf vendor events riscv: add Sifive U74 JSON file
>   RISC-V: Added Syntacore SCR7 PMU events
>
>  tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/mapfile.csv  |  18 +++
>  .../arch/riscv/riscv-sbi-firmware.json        | 134 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../arch/riscv/sifive/u74/firmware.json       |  68 +++++++++
>  .../arch/riscv/sifive/u74/instructions.json   |  92 ++++++++++++
>  .../arch/riscv/sifive/u74/memory.json         |  32 +++++
>  .../arch/riscv/sifive/u74/microarch.json      |  57 ++++++++
>  .../arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/L1D_cache.json  | 102 +++++++++++++
>  .../arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/L1I_cache.json  |  67 +++++++++
>  .../arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/exceptions.json |  67 +++++++++
>  .../arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/execution.json  |  97 +++++++++++++
>  .../arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/firmware.json   |  68 +++++++++
>  .../arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/general.json    |  47 ++++++
>  .../arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/interrupts.json |  32 +++++
>  .../arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/prediction.json |  52 +++++++
>  14 files changed, 933 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/mapfile.csv
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/riscv-sbi-firmware.json
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/firmware.json
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/instructions.json
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/memory.json
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/sifive/u74/microarch.json
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/L1D_cache.json
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/L1I_cache.json
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/exceptions.json
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/execution.json
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/firmware.json
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/general.json
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/interrupts.json
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/riscv/syntacore/scr7/prediction.json

Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>

not sure if you're looking for this via the RISC-V tree, it looks like 
usually these get merged via a perf tree?  That's OK with me, but I'm 
also OK taking them through the RISC-V tree.  Note that cpuinfo 
dependency seems to be triggering kasan failures, so we'll at least need 
to sort that out.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ