linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next v2 2/2] fs/ntfs3: Eliminate unnecessary ternary operator in ntfs_d

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKwvOdkrmMQVaQ6vD9f2BN_tYyxcjhwH28pGxkstmr-Pop-z6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2022 16:26:05 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 2/2] fs/ntfs3: Eliminate unnecessary ternary
 operator in ntfs_d_compare()

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 4:24 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> 'a == b ? 0 : 1' is logically equivalent to 'a != b'.
>
> Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>

Thanks for the patch!
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>

> ---
>
> v2: New patch.
>
>  fs/ntfs3/namei.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/namei.c b/fs/ntfs3/namei.c
> index 5d3a6ce3f05f..6b0d2c01d6ff 100644
> --- a/fs/ntfs3/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs3/namei.c
> @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static int ntfs_d_compare(const struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int len1,
>         /* First try fast implementation. */
>         for (;;) {
>                 if (!lm--)
> -                       return len1 == len2 ? 0 : 1;
> +                       return len1 != len2;
>
>                 if ((c1 = *n1++) == (c2 = *n2++))
>                         continue;
> --
> 2.37.3
>


-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers