| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20221004093131.40392-3-thuth@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:31:30 +0200
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: selftests: x86: Use TAP interface in the sync_regs test
The sync_regs test currently does not have any output (unless one
of the TEST_ASSERT statement fails), so it's hard to say for a user
whether a certain new sub-test has been included in the binary or
not. Let's make this a little bit more user-friendly and include
some TAP output via the kselftests.h interface.
To be able to distinguish the different sub-tests more easily, we
also break up the huge main() function here in more fine grained
parts (similar to what has been done to the s390 sync_regs_test
already).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c | 113 ++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c
index 9b6db0b0b13e..8583b425a3e0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c
@@ -80,26 +80,11 @@ static void compare_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu_events *left,
#define TEST_SYNC_FIELDS (KVM_SYNC_X86_REGS|KVM_SYNC_X86_SREGS|KVM_SYNC_X86_EVENTS)
#define INVALID_SYNC_FIELD 0x80000000
-int main(int argc, char *argv[])
-{
- struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
- struct kvm_vm *vm;
- struct kvm_run *run;
- struct kvm_regs regs;
- struct kvm_sregs sregs;
- struct kvm_vcpu_events events;
- int rv, cap;
-
- /* Tell stdout not to buffer its content */
- setbuf(stdout, NULL);
-
- cap = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS);
- TEST_REQUIRE((cap & TEST_SYNC_FIELDS) == TEST_SYNC_FIELDS);
- TEST_REQUIRE(!(cap & INVALID_SYNC_FIELD));
-
- vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code);
- run = vcpu->run;
+void test_read_invalid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
+ int rv;
/* Request reading invalid register set from VCPU. */
run->kvm_valid_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD;
@@ -115,6 +100,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
"Invalid kvm_valid_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n",
rv);
run->kvm_valid_regs = 0;
+}
+
+void test_set_invalid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
+ int rv;
/* Request setting invalid register set into VCPU. */
run->kvm_dirty_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD;
@@ -130,11 +121,21 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
"Invalid kvm_dirty_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n",
rv);
run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
+}
+
+void test_req_and_verify_all_valid_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
+ struct kvm_vcpu_events events;
+ struct kvm_sregs sregs;
+ struct kvm_regs regs;
+ int rv;
/* Request and verify all valid register sets. */
/* TODO: BUILD TIME CHECK: TEST_ASSERT(KVM_SYNC_X86_NUM_FIELDS != 3); */
run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ TEST_ASSERT(rv == 0, "vcpu_run failed: %d\n", rv);
TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO,
"Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n",
run->exit_reason,
@@ -148,6 +149,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
vcpu_events_get(vcpu, &events);
compare_vcpu_events(&events, &run->s.regs.events);
+}
+
+void test_set_and_verify_various_reg_values(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
+ struct kvm_vcpu_events events;
+ struct kvm_sregs sregs;
+ struct kvm_regs regs;
+ int rv;
/* Set and verify various register values. */
run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xBAD1DEA;
@@ -157,6 +167,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
run->kvm_dirty_regs = KVM_SYNC_X86_REGS | KVM_SYNC_X86_SREGS;
rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ TEST_ASSERT(rv == 0, "vcpu_run failed: %d\n", rv);
TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO,
"Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n",
run->exit_reason,
@@ -176,6 +187,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
vcpu_events_get(vcpu, &events);
compare_vcpu_events(&events, &run->s.regs.events);
+}
+
+void test_clear_kvm_dirty_regs_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
+ int rv;
/* Clear kvm_dirty_regs bits, verify new s.regs values are
* overwritten with existing guest values.
@@ -184,6 +201,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xDEADBEEF;
rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ TEST_ASSERT(rv == 0, "vcpu_run failed: %d\n", rv);
TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO,
"Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n",
run->exit_reason,
@@ -191,6 +209,13 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx != 0xDEADBEEF,
"rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.",
run->s.regs.regs.rbx);
+}
+
+void test_clear_kvm_valid_and_dirty_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
+ struct kvm_regs regs;
+ int rv;
/* Clear kvm_valid_regs bits and kvm_dirty_bits.
* Verify s.regs values are not overwritten with existing guest values
@@ -199,9 +224,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
run->kvm_valid_regs = 0;
run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xAAAA;
+ vcpu_regs_get(vcpu, ®s);
regs.rbx = 0xBAC0;
vcpu_regs_set(vcpu, ®s);
rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ TEST_ASSERT(rv == 0, "vcpu_run failed: %d\n", rv);
TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO,
"Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n",
run->exit_reason,
@@ -213,6 +240,13 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
TEST_ASSERT(regs.rbx == 0xBAC0 + 1,
"rbx guest value incorrect 0x%llx.",
regs.rbx);
+}
+
+void test_clear_kvm_valid_regs_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
+ struct kvm_regs regs;
+ int rv;
/* Clear kvm_valid_regs bits. Verify s.regs values are not overwritten
* with existing guest values but that guest values are overwritten
@@ -222,6 +256,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
run->kvm_dirty_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xBBBB;
rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ TEST_ASSERT(rv == 0, "vcpu_run failed: %d\n", rv);
TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO,
"Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n",
run->exit_reason,
@@ -233,8 +268,46 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
TEST_ASSERT(regs.rbx == 0xBBBB + 1,
"rbx guest value incorrect 0x%llx.",
regs.rbx);
+}
+
+struct testdef {
+ const char *name;
+ void (*test)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+} testlist[] = {
+ { "read invalid", test_read_invalid },
+ { "set invalid", test_set_invalid },
+ { "request+verify all valid regs", test_req_and_verify_all_valid_regs },
+ { "set+verify various regs", test_set_and_verify_various_reg_values },
+ { "clear kvm_dirty_regs bits", test_clear_kvm_dirty_regs_bits },
+ { "clear kvm valid+dirty_regs", test_clear_kvm_valid_and_dirty_regs },
+ { "clear kvm valid_regs bits", test_clear_kvm_valid_regs_bits },
+};
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ int idx, cap;
+
+ /* Tell stdout not to buffer its content */
+ setbuf(stdout, NULL);
+
+ ksft_print_header();
+
+ cap = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS);
+ TEST_REQUIRE((cap & TEST_SYNC_FIELDS) == TEST_SYNC_FIELDS);
+ TEST_REQUIRE(!(cap & INVALID_SYNC_FIELD));
+
+ ksft_set_plan(ARRAY_SIZE(testlist));
+
+ vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code);
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(testlist); idx++) {
+ testlist[idx].test(vcpu);
+ ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", testlist[idx].name);
+ }
kvm_vm_free(vm);
- return 0;
+ ksft_finished(); /* Print results and exit() accordingly */
}
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists