[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fccda8a1-5a40-d840-bd3f-ec44b87bb575@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:42:01 +0200
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] mfd: qcom-pm8xxx: drop unused PM8018 compatible
On 04/10/2022 11:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/10/2022 10:08, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> The PM8921 compatible is used as fallback when PM8018 is available,
>> then remove PM8018 compatible.
>
> s/then/so/
>
> But it's a bit confusing because PM8018 is not "available". It is
> "present" or "is" instead, so rather:
> "The PM8018 compatible is always used with PM8921 fallback, so PM8018
> compatible can be safely removed from device ID table".
Thx for the suggestion, will use this wording, same in patch 9.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thanks,
Neil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists