[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABtFH5LLxjaWHFLRGjVb9x1a_SJoHzD_GsOqn-e9uQAJ6mOocg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 16:59:58 +0800
From: ChiaEn Wu <peterwu.pub@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, lee@...nel.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, sre@...nel.org, chiaen_wu@...htek.com,
cy_huang@...htek.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: mt6370: fix the interrupt order of
the charger in the example
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 4:33 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
...
>
> Eh, my patch was merged in July... and yours from September still does
> not use updated multi-led bindings. Was it even tested before sending?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Hi Krzysztof,
I must apologize for checking our patches are based on v5.19 (I also
forgot to apply your patch before checking patches......), not the
v6.0-rc series at that time.
I will update the latest code and check my patch again and again
before submitting the patch next time.
I'm very sorry for this mistake.......
--
Best Regards,
ChiaEn Wu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists